<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogging Guidelines, Part 3: Steps To Do For Every Post</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.subjectivelyspeaking.net/2010/03/05/blogging-guidelines-part-3-steps-to-do-for-every-post/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.subjectivelyspeaking.net/2010/03/05/blogging-guidelines-part-3-steps-to-do-for-every-post/</link>
	<description>social media &#124; social networking &#124; &#34;2.0&#34; management, business, and web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:26:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alan Belniak</title>
		<link>http://www.subjectivelyspeaking.net/2010/03/05/blogging-guidelines-part-3-steps-to-do-for-every-post/comment-page-1/#comment-286</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Belniak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 01:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.subjectivelyspeaking.net/?p=448#comment-286</guid>
		<description>Mike, excellent feedback, and I agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, excellent feedback, and I agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Belniak</title>
		<link>http://www.subjectivelyspeaking.net/2010/03/05/blogging-guidelines-part-3-steps-to-do-for-every-post/comment-page-1/#comment-1566</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Belniak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 01:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.subjectivelyspeaking.net/?p=448#comment-1566</guid>
		<description>Mike, excellent feedback, and I agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, excellent feedback, and I agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Pascale</title>
		<link>http://www.subjectivelyspeaking.net/2010/03/05/blogging-guidelines-part-3-steps-to-do-for-every-post/comment-page-1/#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Pascale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.subjectivelyspeaking.net/?p=448#comment-284</guid>
		<description>Great tips, Alan! As someone who&#039;s just begun his first weekly (tho not weakly) blog, I thank you for this series. I&#039;m glad to know I&#039;ve followed most of your points so far.

Only thing I&#039;d add thus far would be to point 7, which would be to PROOFREAD it in addition to using spell check. About 90 percent of the blogs and articles I read contain some form of confusion between possessives and contractions (respectively, &quot;its&quot; and &quot;it&#039;s&quot;, &quot;their&quot; and &quot;they&#039;re&quot;, &quot;our&quot; and &quot;are&quot;), or popular blunders like  &quot;would/could/should of&quot; vs. &quot;would&#039;ve/could&#039;ve/should&#039;ve&quot;, which spell check would not catch.

Things like that not only drive me nuts, but considering most of us learned those differences in junior high school, they present a negative, unprofessional and uneducated image of the blogger/writer. (If you can&#039;t spend 30 seconds to proofread your writing/promotion/advertising, why should customers trust you to provide top-level work or service?)

And if you have the luxury, have someone else you trust proofread for you, as it&#039;s much more difficult to catch our own errors...I&#039;ve learned that the hard way.

Thanks again! Looking forward to the rest of the series.

Best,
Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great tips, Alan! As someone who&#8217;s just begun his first weekly (tho not weakly) blog, I thank you for this series. I&#8217;m glad to know I&#8217;ve followed most of your points so far.</p>
<p>Only thing I&#8217;d add thus far would be to point 7, which would be to PROOFREAD it in addition to using spell check. About 90 percent of the blogs and articles I read contain some form of confusion between possessives and contractions (respectively, &#8220;its&#8221; and &#8220;it&#8217;s&#8221;, &#8220;their&#8221; and &#8220;they&#8217;re&#8221;, &#8220;our&#8221; and &#8220;are&#8221;), or popular blunders like  &#8220;would/could/should of&#8221; vs. &#8220;would&#8217;ve/could&#8217;ve/should&#8217;ve&#8221;, which spell check would not catch.</p>
<p>Things like that not only drive me nuts, but considering most of us learned those differences in junior high school, they present a negative, unprofessional and uneducated image of the blogger/writer. (If you can&#8217;t spend 30 seconds to proofread your writing/promotion/advertising, why should customers trust you to provide top-level work or service?)</p>
<p>And if you have the luxury, have someone else you trust proofread for you, as it&#8217;s much more difficult to catch our own errors&#8230;I&#8217;ve learned that the hard way.</p>
<p>Thanks again! Looking forward to the rest of the series.</p>
<p>Best,<br />
Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Pascale</title>
		<link>http://www.subjectivelyspeaking.net/2010/03/05/blogging-guidelines-part-3-steps-to-do-for-every-post/comment-page-1/#comment-1565</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Pascale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.subjectivelyspeaking.net/?p=448#comment-1565</guid>
		<description>Great tips, Alan! As someone who&#039;s just begun his first weekly (tho not weakly) blog, I thank you for this series. I&#039;m glad to know I&#039;ve followed most of your points so far.

Only thing I&#039;d add thus far would be to point 7, which would be to PROOFREAD it in addition to using spell check. About 90 percent of the blogs and articles I read contain some form of confusion between possessives and contractions (respectively, &quot;its&quot; and &quot;it&#039;s&quot;, &quot;their&quot; and &quot;they&#039;re&quot;, &quot;our&quot; and &quot;are&quot;), or popular blunders like  &quot;would/could/should of&quot; vs. &quot;would&#039;ve/could&#039;ve/should&#039;ve&quot;, which spell check would not catch.

Things like that not only drive me nuts, but considering most of us learned those differences in junior high school, they present a negative, unprofessional and uneducated image of the blogger/writer. (If you can&#039;t spend 30 seconds to proofread your writing/promotion/advertising, why should customers trust you to provide top-level work or service?)

And if you have the luxury, have someone else you trust proofread for you, as it&#039;s much more difficult to catch our own errors...I&#039;ve learned that the hard way.

Thanks again! Looking forward to the rest of the series.

Best,
Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great tips, Alan! As someone who&#8217;s just begun his first weekly (tho not weakly) blog, I thank you for this series. I&#8217;m glad to know I&#8217;ve followed most of your points so far.</p>
<p>Only thing I&#8217;d add thus far would be to point 7, which would be to PROOFREAD it in addition to using spell check. About 90 percent of the blogs and articles I read contain some form of confusion between possessives and contractions (respectively, &#8220;its&#8221; and &#8220;it&#8217;s&#8221;, &#8220;their&#8221; and &#8220;they&#8217;re&#8221;, &#8220;our&#8221; and &#8220;are&#8221;), or popular blunders like  &#8220;would/could/should of&#8221; vs. &#8220;would&#8217;ve/could&#8217;ve/should&#8217;ve&#8221;, which spell check would not catch.</p>
<p>Things like that not only drive me nuts, but considering most of us learned those differences in junior high school, they present a negative, unprofessional and uneducated image of the blogger/writer. (If you can&#8217;t spend 30 seconds to proofread your writing/promotion/advertising, why should customers trust you to provide top-level work or service?)</p>
<p>And if you have the luxury, have someone else you trust proofread for you, as it&#8217;s much more difficult to catch our own errors&#8230;I&#8217;ve learned that the hard way.</p>
<p>Thanks again! Looking forward to the rest of the series.</p>
<p>Best,<br />
Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Belniak</title>
		<link>http://www.subjectivelyspeaking.net/2010/03/05/blogging-guidelines-part-3-steps-to-do-for-every-post/comment-page-1/#comment-1085</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Belniak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 11:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.subjectivelyspeaking.net/?p=448#comment-1085</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;[new blog post] I&#039;ve posted part 3 of my 5-part series on getting started with blogging &gt;&gt; http://bit.ly/aAhkkf &#124; Did I miss anything yet?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">[new blog post] I&#39;ve posted part 3 of my 5-part series on getting started with blogging &gt;&gt; <a href="http://bit.ly/aAhkkf" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/aAhkkf</a> | Did I miss anything yet?</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

